Contents Previous Next

10. Preventing Domestic Violence: Clinical Guidelines on Routine Screening

Overview

Screening for domestic violence provides a critical opportunity for disclosure of domestic violence and provides a woman and her health care provider the chance to develop a plan to protect her safety and improve her health. Recent experience with AIDS, smoking cessation and improved outcomes in breast cancer and cardiovascular disease support the efficacy of early identification and intervention. The prevalence and the health, social and economic costs of domestic violence require equivalent attention and equally effective action by the health care system.

For five years, the Family Violence Prevention Fund (FUND), a national domestic violence advocacy organization has promoted routine screening for domestic violence by health care providers. Concurring with this policy are the American Medical Association, the American Nurses Association and a number of other national health care organizations that recommend that health care practitioners screen for domestic violence.1-3 As screening practice has become more widespread, and as data have been collected that support the efficacy of screening for domestic violence, the need for a set of clear guidelines for screening practice has become apparent. Providers are seeking this information in order to improve patient care, managed care plans and medical organizations in order to promote better practice across their organizations, and researchers and analysts in order to be able to better assess the state of domestic violence practice.

In this document, the FUND presents its recommendations for how screening should occur within the health care system. To develop this policy, the FUND conducted an extensive literature review and held a conference with expert health practitioners in the field of domestic violence screening, intervention and prevention and advocates in the domestic violence community.

The FUND recommends that all health care institutions and practitioners follow these guidelines which include both a general policy statement and health setting specific recommendations. The FUND is currently working with national health and medical associations and state organizations to jointly encourage the widespread implementation of these guidelines.

Because it is critical that providers understand how to respond to domestic violence victims once they are identified, policies and protocols on domestic violence must also include clinical guides on effective assessment, intervention, documentation and referral. The FUND recommends that providers pursue training and assistance on these skills prior to implementing screening. Model training materials, departmental guidelines, protocols and other tools that can assist you are available through the FUND and many other organizations.

Rationale

Domestic violence is a health care problem of epidemic proportions. It is estimated that between 20% and 30% of all women in the United States have been abused by an intimate partner at some point in their adult lives.4-6 In addition to the immediate trauma caused by abuse, domestic violence contributes to a number of chronic health problems including chronic pain in any organ system,1 depression1,3 and alcohol and substance abuse.1,3,7,8

In addition, the management of other chronic illnesses such as asthma, seizure, diabetes and hypertension may be problematic in women who are being abused.

The health care system is positioned to play a pivotal role in domestic violence prevention. Virtually every American woman interacts with the health care system at some point in her life — whether it is for routine health maintenance, pregnancy, childbirth, illness, injury or by bringing her child for health care services. For the estimated 1.54 to the 3.934 million women who are physically abused by their partners every year, the health care system can be a primary resource.9 In fact, according to a report released in November 1998 by the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, women make 693,933 visits to the health care system per year as a result of injuries due to physical assault.4 The majority of these visits were for treatment of injuries that were inflicted by the women’s intimate partners. The scope of this study only measured the impact of specific injuries directly related to physical assault; experts believe these numbers would be significantly higher if data were available which documented visits for other health problems related to domestic violence and the effect of domestic violence on the management of other illnesses.

Although domestic violence directly or indirectly brings millions of women to the health care system every year, health care providers often treat these women without inquiring about abuse, therefore never recognizing or addressing the underlying cause of their health problems.6, 10- 15 Even when domestic violence results in injuries that were obviously inflicted by another person, health care providers often record the injuries and treat the presenting problem without inquiring about the cause of the injuries. An article printed in the Journal of the American Medical Association in August 1999 found that less than 10 percent of primary care physicians routinely screen for domestic violence during regular office visits.35

Historically, the health care system has played an important role in identifying and preventing widespread public health problems. We believe the models developed to prevent other chronic health problems may effectively be applied to domestic violence.

Routine screening, with its focus on early identification and its capacity to reach patients whether or not symptoms are immediately apparent,16 is a primary starting point for this improved approach to medical practice for domestic violence. Health care professionals currently screen routinely for a number of common conditions, where the prevalence is less than or similar to that of domestic violence.17

Routine and multiple screenings by skilled health care providers, when conducted face-to-face, markedly increase the identification of domestic violence.18-20 Routine screening, as opposed to indicator-based screening, will increase opportunities for identification and intervention with patients presenting with symptoms not generally associated with domestic violence. When victims of domestic violence or those at risk for domestic violence are identified early, providers are able to intervene to help patients understand their options, live more safely within the relationship or safely leave the relationship. Expert opinion suggests that such interventions may lead to reduced morbidity and mortality.21

Screening provides women a valuable opportunity to tell their providers about their experiences with abuse. Battered women report that one of the most important parts of their interactions with their physicians was being listened to about the abuse.22 Published literature also provides guidance for how effective screening should take place, demonstrating the importance of conducting inquiries in private settings and using straightforward, nonjudgmental questions, preferably asked verbally by a health care practitioner.18,23,24

Recommended Practice

Anecdotal evidence, expert opinion and a growing body of data support the efficacy of routine screening in identifying women who are victims of domestic violence or at risk for domestic violence.19,25

The FUND recommends:

The FUND is convinced that the prevalence of domestic violence, and the data demonstrating the efficacy of screening in increasing identification of domestic violence, strongly support these recommendations for routine screening in the identified populations and settings.

Practitioners and health care organizations should develop policies appropriate to their patient populations and settings (rural, urban, multi-ethnic, etc.) that ensure ongoing training for providers on how to implement these screening guidelines as well as policies for assessment, intervention, comprehensive and confidential documentation, and referral management if abuse is identified.

Future Considerations

The FUND also believes that a broader recommendation for universal screening of all patients (men and women) in all settings may eventually be demonstrated to be appropriate. However, practice in these broader areas is still in its infancy, and there is little definitive research on which to draw conclusions. To appropriately address the question of whether a recommendation for universal screening is warranted, the FUND recommends:

Expert opinion and initial studies suggest that the prevalence of domestic violence among lesbians, gay, bisexual, transgender individuals (LGBT) may be comparable to that of domestic violence against heterosexual women. Before recommending appropriate screening practices responding to these communities, it is critical to ensure that the guidelines address the unique issues related to the delivery of quality health care for LGBT individuals. The FUND is working with experts in the field of LGBT health care to develop appropriate guidelines.

In the pediatric setting, screening for domestic violence is clearly appropriate, but raises important and complex questions including when and how mothers of pediatric patients should be screened. Screening mothers in pediatric settings will reach women who may be victims of domestic violence and who come in contact with health care providers only through their children’s care. Screening mothers in this setting will also indicate to providers whether the pediatric patient may be at risk for direct abuse or as a child witness to domestic violence. The FUND is working with experts in pediatrics, family practice and adolescent medicine to develop a set of recommendations for screening in these settings.

On the following pages, practitioners will find a general screening policy on setting specific recommendations. Each addresses who should be screened, which providers should carry out the screening, the recommended frequency of screening and the environment in which screening should take place.

The formal recommendations that follow provide guidance for practitioners and organizations on who should be screened as well as when, where, how and by whom screening should be carried out.

General Screening Policy

This is a general policy on screening women for domestic violence within the health care system. A more detailed set of recommendations for screening for domestic violence in specific health care settings follows.

All health care providers who screen for domestic violence should receive appropriate training on how to ask about abuse, how to respond when it is identified, and on issues of cultural competency and principles of increasing safety and respecting autonomy of battered patients.

Screening can be facilitated by the use of forms or other assessment tools such as the five-question Abuse Assessment Screen.25 Chart prompts are another effective tool to remind providers to screen and have been shown to increase screening rates.26

Specific Health Care Settings
Primary Care

Within the managed care system, women are increasingly being seen in a primary care or obstetrician/gynecologist setting, which serves as their entry point into the health care system. The primary care visit offers a woman the chance to have a private conversation with her health care provider, where screening can be done in a less hectic setting than in the emergency department. The primary care setting also offers an opportunity to screen both women who present for routine health maintenance and those who are presenting for specific health complaints.

Emergency Department/Urgent Care

The extremely high prevalence of domestic violence and severity of injuries due to domestic violence justify universal screening in emergency departments.

According to a report issued in November 1998 by the National Institute of Justice and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, women make 547,000 visits to the emergency department every year for treatment of injuries resulting from physical assault4 Most of these assaults were committed by the women’s intimate partners. The emergency department is a setting where women who are at high risk for immediate physical danger are likely to present. Of 4,448 women presenting in 10 emergency departments in two cities, 37% reported that they had been abused by a partner at some time, 10% reported they were currently in a battering relationship, and 4% said their current visit to the emergency department was for abuse by an intimate partner.9 Of 3,455 women trauma resulting from domestic violence, 14.4% had experienced domestic violence in the past year and 36.9% had been victims of domestic violence at some point in their lives.6

Obstetrics/Gynecology & Family Planning

The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends that every woman and girl presenting to an Ob/Gyn provider be screened for domestic violence. Because the prevalence of domestic violence in the Ob/Gyn setting is high and because many women use their Ob/Gyn provider as their primary provider of health care and do not access other providers in the health care system, screening in this setting is critical.20,25,27 Like primary care, Ob/Gyn and family planning settings offer a woman the chance to have a private conversation with her health care provider, where screening can be done in a less hectic setting than in the emergency department, for example. It is estimated that between 7% and 17% of pregnant women in this country are battered by their partners.28-30 Of 225 pregnant and 142 non-pregnant women presenting to an urban New England urgent care obstetrics and gynecology unit, 184 (46%) reported a history of physical or sexual abuse, and 38 (10%) reported recent abuse.10 Recent clinical studies have proven the effectiveness of a two-minute screening for early detection of abuse to pregnant women. Additional longitudinal studies have tested a 10-minute intervention that was proven highly effective in increasing the safety of pregnant abused women.31

Mental Health

In mental health services, including substance abuse settings, universal domestic violence screening of women and girls should be routine. The American Psychological Association recommends that “routine screening for a history of victimization be included in standard medical and psychological examinations.”3 Abuse has significant, lasting mental health effects that, if undetected, would hinder care. Domestic violence is a significant risk factor for depression, PTSD, anxiety and substance abuse in women.3 In one study of women presenting to an emergency room, 29% of the women who had been in abusive relationships had attempted suicide, whereas, only 4% of the women who had never had an abusive relationship had attempted suicide.12

Inpatient

The inpatient setting provides an opportunity to screen for domestic violence in a setting in which a woman is safely outside the home for a duration of time. One prevalence study of an inpatient female population found a 26% lifetime prevalence of domestic violence.32

Glossary of Terms

Cultural competency: The standard terminology currently used in health care. It refers to the process by which the provider combines general knowledge with specific information provided by the victim about his/her culture, incorporates an awareness of one’s biases, and approaches the definition of culture with a critical eye and open mind.

Domestic violence: A pattern of coercive behaviors that may include repeated battering and injury, psychological abuse, sexual assault, progressive social isolation, deprivation and intimidation. These behaviors are perpetrated by someone who is or was involved in an intimate relationship with the victim.

Routine screening: Routine inquiry, either written or verbal, by health care providers to patients about personal history with domestic violence. Unlike indicator-based screening, routine screening means screening conducted routinely on all individuals or specified categories of individuals in a specified situation.

Suggested Screening Questions
Framing Questions
Direct Verbal Questions
For History Intake Forms/New Patient Questionnaires
Domestic Violence Screening/Documentation Form
DV Screen
DV+
DV+
Date ____________Patient ID# _____________
PatientName _____________________________
Provider Name _____________________________
Patient Pregnant? Yes   No

Assess Patient Safety
Yes No Is abuser here now?
Yes No Is patient afraid of their partner?
Yes No Is patient afraid to go home?
Yes No Has physical violence increased in severity?
Yes No Has partner physically abused children?
Yes No Have children witnessed violence in the home?
Yes No Threats of homicide?
By whom: __________________________________
Yes No Threats of suicide?
By whom: __________________________________
Yes No Is there a gun in the home?
Yes No Alcohol or substance abuse?
Yes No Was safety plan discussed?

Referrals
Hotline number given
Legal referral made
Shelter number given
In-house referral made
Describe:_________________________________
Other referral made
Describe:_________________________________

Reporting
Law enforcement report made
Child Protective Services report made
Adult Protective Services report made

Photographs
Yes No Consent to be photographed?
Yes No Photographs taken?
Attach photographs and consent form

Source: The Family Violence Prevention Fund
383 Rhode Island Street, Suite 304
San Francisco, CA 94103-5133
415.252.8900
website:http//www.fvpf.org
e-mail: fund@fvpf.org

The Family Violence Prevention Fund

Founded in 1980, the Family Violence Prevention Fund (FUND) is a leading national organization devoted to developing pioneering domestic violence prevention strategies and public policy responses in the fields of health care, criminal justice, workplace, public education, and child welfare. The central mission of the FUND is to stem the epidemic of violence in our homes.

The Family Violence Prevention Fund’s National Health Resource Center on Domestic Violence was developed to strengthen the health care response to domestic violence by providing resources, training materials, and technical assistance to health care professionals and to other providers serving victims of domestic violence. Information, materials and program specialists are available through our toll-free number 1-888-Rx-ABUSE.

References
  1. American Medical Association. American Medical Association Diagnostic and Treatment Guidelines on Domestic Violence. Arch Fam Med. 1992;1:39-47.
  2. American Nurses Association. Position Statement on Physical Violence Against Women. Washington, DC: American Nurses Association; 1994.
  3. American Psychological Association. Report of the American Psychological Association Presidential Task Force on Violence and the Family.Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 1996.
  4. National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 1998.
  5. McCauley J, Kern DE, Kolodner K, Dill L, Schroeder AF, DeChant HK, Ryden J, Bass EB, Derogatis LR. The ‘battering syndrome’: prevalence and clinical characteristics of domestic violence in primary care internal medicine practices.” Ann Intern Med. 1995;123:737-746.
  6. Dearwater SR, Coben JH, Campbell JC, Nah G, Glass N, McLoughlin E, Bekemeier B. Prevalence of intimatepartner abuse in women treated at community hospital emergency departments. JAMA. 1998;280:433-438.
  7. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. The Battered Woman.Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1989.
  8. American Public Health Association. Position Paper 9211(PP): Domestic Violence. APHA Public Policy Statements, 1948-present, cumulative. Washington, DC: American Public Health Association; 1992.
  9. Pakesier RA, Lenaghan P, Muelleman R. Battered women: where they go for help. J Emer Nurs. 1998;24:16-19.
  10. McGrath ME, Peipert JF, Hogan JW. A prevalence survey of abuse and screening for abuse in urgent care patients. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;91:511-514.
  11. McGrath ME, Bettacchi A, Duffy S, Peipert J, Becker B, St. Angelo L. Violence against women: barriers to intervention in emergency departments. Acad Emerg Med. 1997;4:297-300.
  12. Abbott J, Johnson R, Kosiol-Mclain J, Lowenstein S. Domestic violence against women: incidence and prevalence in an emergency department population. JAMA. 1995;273:1763-1767.
  13. Parsons L, Zaccaro D, Wells B, Stovall T. Methods of and attitudes toward screening obstetrics and gynecology patients for domestic violence. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173:381-387.
  14. Horan DL, Chapin J, Klein L, Schmidt LA, Schulkin J. Domestic violence screening practices of obstetrician-gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol. 1998;92:785-789.
  15. Rodriguez MA, Bauer HM, McLoughlin E, Grumbach K. Screening and Intervention for Intimate Partner Abuse. JAMA. 1999;282:468-474.
  16. Mausner J, Kramer S. Screening in the detection of disease. Epidemiology: An Introductory Text. Philadelphia, PA: W.B. Saunders Company; 1985.
  17. Routine screening for adult women is the standard of care for hypertension and cervical cancer. The prevalence of hypertension is 23% (Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention FASTATS) and the prevalence of diabetes is 3% (Source: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention FASTATS). The prevalenceof domestic violence for adult women is between 20% and 30% (see citation 4-6).
  18. McFarlane J, Christoffel K, Bateman L, Miller V, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse: self-report versus nurse interview. Public Health Nurs. 1991;8:242-250.
  19. McFarlane J, Greenberg L, Weltge A, Watson M. Identification of abuse in emergency departments: effectiveness of a two-question screening tool. J Emerg Nurs. 1995;21:391-394.
  20. McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Bullock L. Assessing for abuse during pregnancy: severity and frequency of injuries and associated entry into prenatal care. JAMA. 1992;267:3176-3178.
  21. Saltzman LE, Salmi, LR, Branche, CM, Bolen, JC. Public health screening for intimate violence. Violence Against Women. 1997;3:319-331.
  22. Hamberger LK, Ambuel B, Marbella A, Donze J. Physician interaction with battered women: the women’s perspective. Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:575-582.
  23. Parker B, McFarlane J. Nursing assessment of the battered pregnant women. Matern Child Nurs J. 1991;16:161-164.
  24. Feldhaus K, Koziol-McLain J, Amsbury H, Norton I, Lowenstein S, Abbott J. Accuracy of three brief screening questions for detecting partner violence in the emergency department. JAMA. 1997;277:1357-1361.
  25. Norton LB, Peipert J, Zierler S, Lima B, Hume L. Battering in pregnancy: an assessment of two screening methods.” Obstet Gynecol. 1995;85:321-325.
  26. Olson L, Anctil C, Fullerton L, Brillman J, Arbuckle J, Sklar D. Increasing emergency physician recognition of domestic violence. Ann Emerg Med. 1996;27:741-746.
  27. Helton AS, McFarlane J, Anderson ET. Battered and pregnant: a prevalence study. Am J Public Health. 1987;77:1337.
  28. Amaro H, Fried LE, Cabral H, Zuckerman B. Violence during pregnancy and substance abuse. Am J Public Health.. 1990;80:575-579.
  29. Campbell J, Poland ML, Waller JB, Ager J. Correlates of battering during pregnancy. Res Nurs Health. 1992;15:219-226.
  30. Parker B, McFarlane J, Soeken K. Abuse during pregnancy: effects on maternal complication and birth weight in adult and teenage women. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:323-328.
  31. McFarlane J, Parker B, Soeken K, Silva C, Reel S. Safety behaviors of abused women following an intervention program offered during pregnancy. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1998;27:64-69.
  32. McKenzie K, Burns R, McCarthy E, Freund K. Prevalence of domestic violence in an inpatient female population. J Gen Intern Med. 1998;13:277-279.
  33. Parker B, McFarlane J, Soeken K, Torres S, Campbell, D. Physical and emotional abuse in pregnancy: A comparison of adult and teenage women. Nurs Res. 1993;42:173-177.
  34. The Commonwealth Fund, First Comprehensive National Health Survey of American Women, July 1993.
  35. Rodriguez, M., Bauer, H., McLoughlin, E., Grumbach, K. (1999). Screening and Intervention for Intimate Partner Abuse: Practices and Attitudes of Primary Care Physicians. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, No. 5, August 4, 1999.